![]() |
||||||||
HARD ROCK
Notes from the 4A’s Media Conference, Orlando, Florida
By Erwin Ephron
|
|
Gone also was the legendary spunkiness of all things advertising. Only a spark here and there from dot-com survivors, beaming like a homeless who has just hit the Lotto. Business was good, yet this was a meeting of Teamsters who were losing the docks. Everyone telling them to do something different, but no one telling them what different to do. Not as long as that great shipwreck called television sat tall in the harbor.
America’s belief in advertising has deep roots. “It pays to advertise” was our slogan of choice from the 1931 Carole Lombard comedy rallying business through the Great Depression. And even back then the thought wasn’t new, just a remake of a 1919 pre-talkie from Paramount-Lasky. After all, advertising
made money move. It created goals, raised expectations, brought delight,
defined society for good or bad. Television in particular
was a guide to growing up as a family and as a people. A Machine that Does the Dishes? TV advertising of the 50’s, 60’s and 70’s was more interesting, more informative and far more effective. It was part of the dialogue of daily life. Example, Westinghouse Studio One. Dish-washers don’t fascinate my wife. She grew up with them. When the one we have breaks, she’ll buy another. That’s not the fault of advertising. We are a wise old consumer society. Much of what we buy is so familiar there’s little place for news, fresh promise or surprise. As a result advertising today, with all its excesses and press, tends to be a weak marketing force, especially compared to what it was once able to do. If you really want the good old days when ads moved product off the shelf, go to India, Romania or Pakistan where they’re learning how to shop. That’s where the new Ted Bates’ are hanging out, and there are no footprints on the snow. [1] Bring in the Clowns Meanwhile, back at the meeting, talk turned to accountability and ROI. Isn’t Accountability a vague, mean-spirited word implying malfeasance, when the issue is more often diligence and luck? Accountability goes with responsibility, so when decisions are shared so must be the blame. Advertisers want advertising that works, but
often have no firm commitment about how to accomplish that. An operations researcher
was hired by a major
brewery to benchmark its advertising practice. After long study, the expert’s
data showed the probability of a campaign increasing brand share was one in
twenty. But it got worse. The probability of management selecting that particular
campaign was also one in twenty, making the true odds 400 to one. A folk-tale?
Perhaps. Media People Should be More Proud That means when the message is received is more important than how many times it’s sent, i.e., if you’ve just leased a Toyota, the volume of Nissan commercials you see doesn’t much matter. Media people know Continuity creates Serendipity. A message works simply because it’s there when the consumer is ready. And it can’t be there if you’ve already spent the money beating on the consumer’s head. But a low ROI may not mean waste. Most packaged-goods ad dollars are spent to protect, not to grow the business. In that land simply sustaining the budget may be a better measure of success than growing the ROI. Media planners have learned that continuity and dispersion in advertising are the Great Goods, and that too many messages in too short a time is a great waste of money. These simple thoughts will continue to save advertisers millions. We learned at Orlando that there are familiar questions, but no new answers. We felt the threat of technology more than its wonder. It was a cautious meeting as befits changing times. It’s not a bad approach for now.
[1] Of the 3,500 weekly visits to my website www.Ephrononmedia.com, close to 900 come from what the world regards as underdeveloped countries. - March 1, 2004 -
|
|
|||||||||||||||